Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Carya illinoinensis
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Cultivars and selections == UF/IFAS lists many named pecan selections and attaches practical attributes to some of them. These descriptions are regional extension guidance rather than a controlled comparison, so they are best used to frame a choice rather than to rank every cultivar. * '''Cheyenne''' is described as semi-dwarf with medium to large fruit. Its smaller stated form may interest a grower who has less space than a standard pecan site, but the source does not establish container suitability or a guaranteed mature size under every rootstock. * '''Chickasaw''' is described as disease resistant with medium to large fruit. The resistance statement is a cultivar description, not immunity under all disease pressure or climates. * '''Stuart''' is described as an old, vase-shaped, large-fruited selection with weak wood. Large fruit and an established form may be attractive, while the weak-wood description is a structural tradeoff for site planning and pruning. * '''Melrose''', '''Candy''', '''Elliot''', and '''Sumner''' are described as having increased scab resistance. The source does not provide a common numeric resistance scale or a universal disease-free result, so the selections should not be treated as interchangeable guarantees. Cultivar choice should also account for pollination timing. The University of Georgia charts provide pollen-shed, pistil-receptivity, and compatibility records for planning combinations, but they do not turn a listed pairing into a guaranteed yield outcome.<sup>[[#cite_note-4|[4]]]</sup>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Wikifruit.com may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Wikifruit:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)